16:06:04	 From Joanna Schimizzi : https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150527091547.htm
16:14:03	 From Keiauda Tennant : I do not think you would be able to adequately address the literacy standard because the article doesn't go into detail about the methods or tests used to determine that the venom has a possible toxic effect. It would be really difficult to assess reasoning and evidence because of this.
16:14:10	 From Lauren Schultz : So even I get confused by the technical language in this article.  But the article seems to support the findings by using evidence (aka what happened during the experiment) to support the claim.  However, it's not as specifically detailed as the study itself would be.
16:14:21	 From robinc.williams : I liked this article, but felt it lacked the evidence. It really only sited one example where they found this to be true...
16:14:44	 From Amy Moore : This article is addressing a scientific study that was done to show that vemon is toxic to cancel cells. This article doesn't really provide a lot of specific support for the extent of that study since it is shorter and doesn
16:14:45	 From robinc.williams : It may be good as the students could assess it and find that it may not be the best source
16:15:04	 From Amy Moore : tt provide specifc evidence for the students to analyze themselves. 
16:15:07	 From Tamryn : I see the article as an overview of the study and research but lacking depth in regards to the eivdence behind the idea
16:15:08	 From Justin : the article, while technical, doesn’t really establish and clear evidence.
16:15:18	 From Lori Zeman : I agree with the others that there are great claims to research but the text doesn't support the evidence enough
16:15:22	 From Christina Segura : The article was interesting to read but seemed to lack evidence. 
16:15:24	 From Laura Armstrong : I think this article supports the literacy standard because of the evidence shown, but like Robin said, there is only one example so it doesn’t provide enough “proof”
16:15:36	 From Amy Moore : To many it is a summary that there is evidence without actually providing the evidence. 
16:15:40	 From Kristen Ward : I felt like the text was more of an introduction to the claim but didn’t completely have reasoning and evidence to support the claim.  I might expect a more in-depth article to follow up the claim.
16:15:58	 From Anne Bucci : It was interesting. I actually googled scorpion venom and found a much better article. I also thought it was really brief and had too much technical language.
16:16:03	 From Kristen Johnson : Not having the technical background in biology I’m not sure that the authors claim has been supported. There is reference to the venom having a toxic effect against lymphoma cells, but nothing definitive.
16:16:14	 From Beth Slater : The article seems to really just be reporting what they found - the “possible” toxic effect
16:30:23	 From Beth Slater : I did, but I was late and did it this afternoon :)
16:32:13	 From Anne Bucci : I knew it! When I googled earlier I did find one which was clearly Creative Commons!
16:35:34	 From Lauren Schultz : no questions here
16:39:26	 From robinc.williams : very thorough and I agree with Lauren!
16:39:56	 From Anne Bucci : ONE Access databases
16:40:06	 From Anne Bucci : NC Wise Owl
16:40:19	 From robinc.williams : definitely the databases!
16:43:24	 From Amy Moore : For NC WISE OWL the source I found I had to login to see the article. Does this mean it is not CreativeCommons
16:43:34	 From Lauren Schultz : It's probably not
16:44:03	 From Amy Moore : Thanks! 
16:44:18	 From Lauren Schultz : I agree with Robin - varied formats
16:44:54	 From robinc.williams : I don't think it's a relic, but just one piece
16:45:06	 From Lauren Schultz : agreed with Robin. It also depends on the topic...
16:47:15	 From Amy Moore : I agree. I am use to using databases as a science major but it seems all of those are by definition of being in a database not CreativeCommons. 
16:51:16	 From Kristen Johnson : Hi Beth’s Baby!!
16:52:20	 From Beth Slater : he says hi, obviously ;)
16:53:30	 From daniellegasser : Thank you!
16:53:31	 From Beth Slater : thanks!
16:53:34	 From robinc.williams : good night!
16:53:39	 From Kristen Johnson : Thanks!!
16:53:39	 From Laura Armstrong : thanks!
16:53:39	 From Joanna Schimizzi : Bye everyone!