Search Resources

4 Results

View
Selected filters:
  • Wolf Vanpaemel
Are We Wasting a Good Crisis? The Availability of Psychological Research Data after the Storm
Unrestricted Use
CC BY
Rating

To study the availability of psychological research data, we requested data from 394 papers, published in all issues of four APA journals in 2012. We found that 38% of the researchers sent their data immediately or after reminders. These findings are in line with estimates of the willingness to share data in psychology from the recent or remote past. Although the recent crisis of confidence that shook psychology has highlighted the importance of open research practices, and technical developments have greatly facilitated data sharing, our findings make clear that psychology is nowhere close to being an open science.

Subject:
Psychology
Material Type:
Reading
Author:
Gert Storms
Leen Deriemaecker
Maarten Vermorgen
Wolf Vanpaemel
Date Added:
06/23/2020
Are We Wasting a Good Crisis? The Availability of Psychological Research Data after the Storm
Unrestricted Use
CC BY
Rating

To study the availability of psychological research data, we requested data from 394 papers, published in all issues of four APA journals in 2012. We found that 38% of the researchers sent their data immediately or after reminders. These findings are in line with estimates of the willingness to share data in psychology from the recent or remote past. Although the recent crisis of confidence that shook psychology has highlighted the importance of open research practices, and technical developments have greatly facilitated data sharing, our findings make clear that psychology is nowhere close to being an open science.

Subject:
Psychology
Material Type:
Reading
Provider:
Collabra: Psychology
Author:
Gert Storms
Leen Deriemaecker
Maarten Vermorgen
Wolf Vanpaemel
Date Added:
08/07/2020
A Practical Guide for Transparency in Psychological Science
Unrestricted Use
CC BY
Rating

The credibility of scientific claims depends upon the transparency of the research products upon which they are based (e.g., study protocols, data, materials, and analysis scripts). As psychology navigates a period of unprecedented introspection, user-friendly tools and services that support open science have flourished. However, the plethora of decisions and choices involved can be bewildering. Here we provide a practical guide to help researchers navigate the process of preparing and sharing the products of their research (e.g., choosing a repository, preparing their research products for sharing, structuring folders, etc.). Being an open scientist means adopting a few straightforward research management practices, which lead to less error prone, reproducible research workflows. Further, this adoption can be piecemeal – each incremental step towards complete transparency adds positive value. Transparent research practices not only improve the efficiency of individual researchers, they enhance the credibility of the knowledge generated by the scientific community.

Subject:
Psychology
Material Type:
Reading
Author:
Alicia Hofelich Mohr
Frederik Aust
Gustav Nilsonne
Hans Ijzerman
Henrik Danielsson
Johannes Breuer
Michael C. Frank
Olivier Klein
Tom E. Hardwicke
Wolf Vanpaemel
Date Added:
06/29/2018
A Practical Guide for Transparency in Psychological Science
Unrestricted Use
CC BY
Rating

The credibility of scientific claims depends upon the transparency of the research products upon which they are based (e.g., study protocols, data, materials, and analysis scripts). As psychology navigates a period of unprecedented introspection, user-friendly tools and services that support open science have flourished. However, the plethora of decisions and choices involved can be bewildering. Here we provide a practical guide to help researchers navigate the process of preparing and sharing the products of their research (e.g., choosing a repository, preparing their research products for sharing, structuring folders, etc.). Being an open scientist means adopting a few straightforward research management practices, which lead to less error prone, reproducible research workflows. Further, this adoption can be piecemeal – each incremental step towards complete transparency adds positive value. Transparent research practices not only improve the efficiency of individual researchers, they enhance the credibility of the knowledge generated by the scientific community.

Subject:
Psychology
Material Type:
Reading
Author:
Alicia Hofelich Mohr
Frederik Aust
Gustav Nilsonne
Hans Ijzerman
Henrik Danielsson
Johannes Breuer
Michael C. Frank
Olivier Klein
Tom E. Hardwicke
Wolf Vanpaemel
Date Added:
06/04/2020