Search Resources

2 Results

View
Selected filters:
  • Crystal N. Steltenpohl
Giving Community Psychology Away: A case for open access publishing
Unrestricted Use
CC BY
Rating

Amidst increased pressure for transparency in science, researchers and community members are calling for open access to study stimuli and measures, data, and results. These arguments coincidentally align with calls within community psychology to find innovative ways to support communities and increase the prominence of our field. This paper aims to (1) define the current context for community psychologists in open access publishing, (2) illustrate the alignment between open access publishing and community psychology principles, and (3) demonstrate how to engage in open access publishing using community psychology values. Currently, there are several facilitators (e.g. an increasing number of open access journals, the proliferation of blogs, and social media) and barriers (e.g. Article Processing Charges (APCs), predatory journals) to publishing in open access venues. Openly sharing our research findings aligns with our values of (1) citizen participation, (2) social justice, and (3) collaboration and community strengths. Community psychologists desiring to engage in open access publishing can ask journals to waive APCs, publish pre-prints, use blogs and social media to share results, and push for systemic change in a publishing system that disenfranchises researchers, students, and community members.

Subject:
Applied Science
Life Science
Physical Science
Social Science
Psychology
Material Type:
Reading
Provider:
GICPP
Author:
Amy J. Anderson
Crystal N. Steltenpohl
Katherine M. Daniels
Date Added:
09/30/2020
Improving the credibility of empirical legal research: practical suggestions for researchers, journals, and law schools
Only Sharing Permitted
CC BY-NC-ND
Rating

Fields closely related to empirical legal research are enhancing their methods to improve the credibility of their findings. This includes making data, analysis code, and other materials openly available, and preregistering studies. Empirical legal research appears to be lagging behind other fields. This may be due, in part, to a lack of meta-research and guidance on empirical legal studies. The authors seek to fill that gap by evaluating some indicators of credibility in empirical legal research, including a review of guidelines at legal journals. They then provide both general recommendations for researchers, and more specific recommendations aimed at three commonly used empirical legal methods: case law analysis, surveys, and qualitative studies. They end with suggestions for policies and incentive systems that may be implemented by journals and law schools.

Subject:
Law
Material Type:
Reading
Author:
Alexander DeHaven
Alex Holcombe
Crystal N. Steltenpohl
David Mellor
Jason Chin
Justin Pickett
Kathryn Zeiler
Simine Vazire
Tobias Heycke
Date Added:
11/13/2020