Forensics Fingerprinting Lesson Grades 9-12

Lesson Abstract

Students will read an article about a man who is falsely arrested for the Madrid Spain bombing in 2004 based upon fingerprint evidence. He was later cleared of this crime when it was discovered that the FBI examiner mistakenly matched the print to him. Students will then go on to learn the science behind fingerprint matching and how forensic evidence  can be flawed.  This lesson is facilitated by teacher guided inquiry which will allow students to develop their own conclusions and develop an argument derived from the information they obtain through lesson activities.

Lesson Themes & Essential Questions

Lesson Themes

Literacy instruction is balanced with traditional science activities and lessons. The students will read the anchor text, watch a news clip supporting that text, and the following days will be spent on Fingerprint Labs and Activities. The combination of literacy and "traditional science lab activities" will keep the students engaged in the overall unit. This will help to ensure that the stamina to read and write will be offset by practical lab activities. Students will also learn to question the validity of scientific methods for interpreting evidence.

Essential Questions

Why is evidence important in criminal justice?

Are fingerprints enough forensic evidence for conviction?

What are the limitations of fingerprint analysis?

Can a fingerprint be used for conviction of a crime?

Supporting Questions

What types of evidence are there?

What are the flaws of certain types of evidence or collection and interpretation of evidence?

Should a person be convicted with only one type of evidence linking them to the crime?

Standards Addressed

STEM Inquiry Standards

HS-FS-F-1 Understand the characteristics of fingerprints that allow them be systematically classified.

(Taken from Charlotte Mecklenburg Forensics Standards) 

Clarifying Objectives:

  • HS-FS-F-1a Students will be able to describe the physiology of fingerprints.
  • HS-FS-F-1b Students will be able to describe, compare, and identify the different types of fingerprints.
  • HS-FS-F-1c Students will be able to describe, compare, and perform fingerprint detection techniques.
  • HS-FS-F-1d Students will know the historical and current methods for fingerprint matching.


CCSS Grade-specific Standards 

Citing textual evidence

  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RST.9-10.1Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to the precise details of explanations or descriptions.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RST.11-12.1 Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to important distinctions the author makes and to any gaps or inconsistencies in the account.

Determining central ideas or conclusions

  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RST.9-10.2 Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; trace the text's explanation or depiction of a complex process, phenomenon, or concept; provide an accurate summary of the text.
  • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RST.11-12.2 Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; summarize complex concepts, processes, or information presented in a text by paraphrasing them in simpler but still accurate terms.


Learning Objectives

Students will be able to identify the characteristics of fingerprints.

Students will be able to compare and contrast the basic types of fingerprints.

Students will be able to refute arguments that question fingerprint evidence reliability.

Students will be able to describe the latest identification technologies.

Students will be able to identify the characteristics of fingerprints by collecting information from a text.


Text Set

Anchor Text

Title of Anchor Text: PBS Nova Forensics on Trial

URL of Anchor Text: http:// www.cbsnews.com/news/weighing-fingerprints-as-forensic-evidence.

URL of Anchor Text Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIX-cyktpBY

How is it possible to identify the person who committed a crime? A single hair or clothing fiber can allow a crime to be reconstructed and lead police to the responsible person. The goal of a crime-scene investigation is to recognize, document, photograph, and collect evidence at the scene of a crime. Solving the crime depends on piecing together the evidence to form a picture of what happened at the crime scene. ( Bertino, Anthony J. Forensic Science: Fundamentals and Investigations. N.p.: Cengage Learning 2015)

Supporting Texts


Stem SubjectTitle of Supporting TextURL of Supporting Text
Forensic ScienceFingerprints the First IDhttp://files.findlaw.com/pdf/criminal/criminal.findlaw.com_criminal-procedure_fingerprints-the-first-id.pdf
Forensic ScienceA simplified guide to Fingerprint Analysiswww.crime-scene-investigator.net/SimplifiedGuideFingerprints.pdf
Forensic ScienceHow to compare Fingerprints- The Basics. (Ted Talk)http://ed.ted.com/on/Aqvqkgjl#review
Forensic ScienceTest YOUR Skills Are you as good as our fingerprint people?     Now try on your own: Introduction to patterns with a quiz  on pattern recognition at the end.http://www.azafis.gov/skills.asp
Forensic ScienceQuiz: Can you spot the matching fingerprints?www.newscientist.com/gallery/mg20527522600-guess-the-fingerprints
Forensic Science

Fingerprinting Lab  

Fingerprinting Labs with common household supplies

Crime Scene Science: Fingerprinting

http://sciencespot.net/Pages/classforsci.html#fiingerprint


http://www.hometrainingtools.com/a/forensics-science-newsletter



http://www.hometrainingtools.com/a/forensics-science-newsletter

Forensic ScienceMiddle school Options:Some of the material in this lesson may be too complex for middle school.  This is a great site with complete lessons on many forensic topics, including fingerprintinghttp://sciencespot.net/Pages/classforsci.html#fiingerprint


Fingerprints the First IDThis is supporting text to add historical background and introduces the basics of fingerprinting. This can be used in the beginning of the lesson as supplemental information.
A simplified guide to Fingerprint AnalysisThis is a text that provides information on the classification of fingerprints when and how analysis is used. This would be used after the Bombing in Madrid video is shown.
How to compare Fingerprints- The Basics. (Ted Talk)This video explains visually how to read a fingerprint. This would be shown in the Going Further section of Fingerprint Characteristics.

Quiz: Can you spot the matching fingerprints?

Test YOUR Skills Are you as good as our fingerprint people?  

These  online  activities can be given after the Ted Talk Video. This is a online practice activity where fingerprints are matched.

Fingerprinting Labs Options


A fingerprinting lab is recommended to be completed at the end of the unit. There are several options in which to choose from.

 Middle School Resource

We have included a website that is an excellent Middle School resource for all the information on fingerprinting basics including labs.

   


Orginazation of the Text Set


 Text Sequence for Lesson/Unit      Learning Objectives
 1.Introduction to Forensics

Introduce students to the history of Fingerprinting.

 HS-FS-F-1d Students will know the historical and current methods for fingerprint matching/

 2. Read the anchor text article "Weighing Fingerprints as Forensic Evidence, CBS News."
  • HS-FS- F-1a
  • Students will be able to construct an argument for the individuality of fingerprints from the three principles of fingerprints. They will use the premise that no two fingerprints are alike, that fingerprints remain unchanged over a lifetime, and that fingerprints have ridge patterns that permit them to systematically classified.
 3. Watch the video "Forensics on Trial"

 CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RST.9-10.2

 Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; trace the text's explanation or depiction of a complex process, phenomenon, or concept; provide an accurate summary of the text.The reason for watching the video is to address multiple learning styles: visual and  auditory.

 4. Lesson on Fingerprints - this includes reading lessons as well as visual understanding and web-based practice.

 HS-FS-F-1 Understand the characteristics of fingerprints that allow them be systematically classified.

.HS-FS-F-1a Students will be able to describe the physiology of fingerprints.

HS-FS-F-1b Students will be able to describe, compare, and identify the different types of fingerprints.

HS-FS-F-1c Students will be able to describe, compare, and perform fingerprint detection techniques.

HS-FS-F-1d Students will know the historical and current methods for fingerprint matching.

 5. Fingerprinting Lab Students will obtain hands on experience lifting, reading and taking fingerprints. As this is a lab it depends on resources and teacher comfort level to perform this activity. A lab is recommended here.
 6.  Flaws with forensic evidenceStudents will be writing an argumentative response to the question: Should fingerprints be the only piece of evidence used to convict a person of a crime. These supplemental readings will help corroborate what students learned from the anchor text and the video providing more examples of flaws with forensic science.


Student Tasks

Text Dependent Questions

  • Should a person be convicted with only one type of evidence linking them to the crime?
  • Weighing fingerprints news article: Weighing Fingerprints as Forensic Evidence, CBS News

Text 

www.cbsnews.com/news/weighing-fingerprints-as-forensic-evidence

Student Tasks

  1. In this story, fingerprints, which have historically been a widely accepted forensic tool, have been subjected to questioning.  Explain the argument Patrick Kent, Maryland Public Defender and forensic expert,  had about fingerprinting being an art and not a science.
  1. Did the judge agree or disagree with Kent? Explain why.  
  1. How can this decision jeopardize other criminal investigations, current and past?
  1. Tom Bush, FBI, had a convincing argument for using fingerprint evidence.  Explain his argument.

Text

Watch the NOVA video Forensics on Trial and answer the questions as you go.  (Adapted from Ms. Andersons Library Page, Stamford High School)

Go to: http://video.pbs.org/video/2290878958

Chapter 1: Preview

  1. Based on the preview, what is Forensics on Trial about?

Chapter 2: The Landscape of a Finger

  1. Briefly (but thoroughly) describe what happened in Madrid, Spain on March 11, 2004.
  1. What technique was used to visualize the fingerprint relevant to the Madrid case and what are its limitations?
  1. Who did the FBI match the fingerprint to?
  1. Who did Spanish officials determine was really responsible for the terrorist attack in Madrid?
  1. Describe the new technology that is being tested for visualizing fingerprints. What is its major advantage?
  1. After watching the video, did your opinion or feelings change about the situation, compared to just reading about the event?  Did seeing the images of the bombing, the accused, the police work shift your feelings or interpretation? Explain why.
  1. Do you feel a jury could be influenced by watching video or seeing images of the crime or crime scene? Explain.

Formative Assessment Strategy

End of unit activity: After completing the activities in this unit, you will develop an argumentative response to the question: should fingerprints be the only piece of evidence used to convict a person of a crime

  1. Create an argument that discusses the pros and cons of using fingerprints as evidence for convicting a person of a crime.
  1. You must include a wide variety of lessons and examples in your argument, including information in any of the supplemental reading sources
  1. You must, at the end, have a conclusion to the question: Are fingerprints enough forensic evidence for conviction?
  1. You may use any type of format to present this argument (essay, powerpoint, video etc...)


Culminating Learning Experience

Students will demonstrate the ability to collect evidence from a crime scene, correctly analyze the evidence and interpret the data and draw conclusions on the suspect.


Pre-Requisite Learning

*Deductive reasoning skills

* Ability to read

*Ability to formulate an argument

*Ability to tie one piece of information to another

*For Forensic Science class the students have to have a 9th grade education

Pre-assessment Approach

*I will have conducted  some deductive reasoning activities with these students before this lesson.

*To challenge students I have included supplemental readings and websites for further knowledge.

*To  accommodate lower reading leveled students I have provided supplemental resources

 

Organization of Instructional Activities



Day 1- Assign Homework - 30 minutes

Give hw assignment to read Introduction and answer questions.

Weighing Fingerprints as Forensic Evidence

http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=JN.CkVQSqTQ47X6BJu2HAvTTA&w=300&h=300&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0http://az-safford.civicplus.com/images/pages/N464/fingerprint.jpg

Introduction:  Adapted from Forensic Science: Fundamentals and investigation by Bertino &Bertino

For thousands of years, humans have been fascinated with the patterns found on the skin of their fingers.  Archeologists believe the fingerprints pressed into clay tablets as early as 1792 B.C. were used as personal markings.   The science of fingerprinting has been around for hundreds of years.  In 1684, Dr. Nehemiah Grew wrote a paper describing the patterns, including ridges, found on human hands under the microscope.  By 1788 Johann Christoph Andreas Mayer described that “the arrangement of skin ridges is never duplicated in two persons”.  The science developed further and by 1896 Sir Edmund Richard Henry and colleagues created a system that divided fingerprint records into groups based on three patterns; loop, whorl or arch.  Today we are able to take fingerprints digitally and scan them through a database search, IAFIS.  A fingerprint examiner makes the final decision concerning consistency.

The ability to use fingerprints as a mean to identify individuals was a major breakthrough in forensic science.  It gave law enforcement around the world a new tool to solve crimes, clear the innocent, and convict the guilty.  Mark Twain in his novel Pudd’nhead Wilson, created a character, a lawyer, Pudd’nhead Wilson, who in his final address to the jury said:

    “Every human being carries with him from his cradle to his grave, certain physical marks which do not change their character, and by which he can always be identified- and that without shade of doubt or question.  These marks are his signature, his physiological autograph, so to speak, and this autograph cannot be counterfeited, nor can he disguise it or hide it away, nor can it become illegible by the wear and mutations of time.”


Your Thoughts: After reading the introduction, please comment on the following:

  1. What is your prior understanding of using fingerprints as evidence?

  1. Do you believe fingerprinting is foolproof? Explain

  1. Is this evidence enough to convict a person of a crime? Explain


Day 2- Discussion & questions -15 minutes

Formative assessment: student responses to lesson questions.

Discuss the introduction and questions in class.
1. What is your prior understanding of using fingerprints as evidence?
2. Do you believe fingerprinting is foolproof? Explain.
3. Is this evidence enough to convict a person of a crime?: Explain. 

Day 2- Read and answer questions -30 minutes

Reading levels with effect speed at which students complete the assignment. Teachers may wish to extend this to 2 class periods or have students complete for homework.

Formative assessment: student responses to lesson questions.

Before you read the article, Weighing Fingerprints, answer this question

  1. Do you believe fingerprinting analysis should be used for conviction if this is the only evidence that links a suspect to a crime?  Explain your reasoning.

Read the article - “Weighing Fingerprints as Forensic Evidence” and answer the following four questions and finish up as needed for homework.

www.cbsnews.com/news/weighing-fingerprints-as-forensic-evidence

  1. In this story, fingerprints, which have historically been a widely accepted forensic tool, have been subjected to questioning.  Explain the argument Patrick Kent, Maryland Public Defender and forensic expert,  had about fingerprinting being an art and not a science.
  1. Did the judge agree or disagree with Kent? Explain why.
  1. How can this decision jeopardize other criminal investigations, current and past?
  1. Tom Bush, FBI, had a convincing argument for using fingerprint evidence.  Explain his argument.

Question: Going Further

1. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At birth, all children should be fingerprinted and those fingerprints entered into a national database , so that in the guture it will be easier to identify them." Explain your reasoning.

Day 3-  42 minutes 

Watch the video and answer questions. 

Formative assessment: student responses to lesson questions.

Watch the NOVA video   Forensics  on Trial http://video.pbs.org/video/2290878958

and answer the questions as you go.(Adapted from Ms. Andersons Library Page, Stamford High School, http://www.stamfordhigh.org/anderson-science-1.aspx

Chapter 1: Preview

  1. Based on the preview, what is Forensics on Trial about?
Chapter 2: The Landscape of a Finger
  1. Briefly (but thoroughly) describe what happened in Madrid, Spain on March 11, 2004.
  2. What technique was used to visualize the fingerprint relevant to the Madrid case and what are its limitations?
  3. Who did the FBI match the fingerprint to?
  4. Who did Spanish officials determine was really responsible for the terrorist attack in Madrid?
  5. Describe the new technology that is being tested for visualizing fingerprints. What is its major advantage?
  6. After watching the video, did your opinion or feelings change about the situation, compared to just reading about the event?  Did seeing the images of the bombing, the accused, the police work shift your feelings or interpretation? Explain why.
  7. Do you feel a jury could be influenced by watching video or seeing images of the crime or crime scene? Explain.
* Stop video here. You may wish to continue watching to see how bite marks, virtual autopsies and compromised evidence are evaluated in this broadcast. you can access the questions via the following site:http://www.stamfordhigh.org/anderson-science-1.aspx

Day 4- 42 minutes 

Go to webpage and answer questions listed here.

Formative assessment: student responses to lesson questions.

Going Further: Lessons on Fingerprints Go to the following site: A Simplified Guide to Fingerprint Analysis 

(You may wish to print out this text) www.crime-scene-investigator.net/SimplifiedGuideFingerprints.pdf*(if this is too long, here is an alternate site that is more simple) : http://www.afsp.org.uk/node/52

Principles of Fingerprint Analysis
  1. What are the three groups of friction ridge patterns?
To Each His Own
  1. Why are fingerprints used as a means of identification?
When and how is fingerprint analysis used?
  1. List and briefly explain several ways fingerprints can be used in the criminal justice system.

Read over the sections, Where Fingerprints May be Found and How Fingerprints are Collected.  We will be conducting several labs on collecting prints using different methods.  We will refocus on those techniques when it comes time for the lab

How and Where the Analysis is Performed

  1. Explain what the analysis, comparison, evaluation and verification method is.
What are the limitations of fingerprint analysis?
  1. Crime shows tend to lead people to believe that if a fingerprint is discovered, the case will be solved and someone will be brought to justice. Explain the limitations of fingerprint analysis.
How is quality control and quality assurance performed?
  1. In the beginning we heard an argument that fingerprint analysis is an art.  Explain how scientists ensure the most accurate analysis of this evidence.

Day 5-  42 minutes 

Activities 1,2,and 3 are to be done in class and the Supplemental Reading is for homework.

Formative assessment: student's skills on matching fingerprints..

Going Further: Fingerprint Characteristics Assign for homework: Students must read at least 1 article of their choice. Supplemental Reading : to be used to further understand the potential flaws with forensic evidence.

1.Watch the following video and follow along with the lesson to learn fingerprint characteristic analysis

http://ed.ted.com/on/Aqvqkgjl#review

2. Now try on your own: Introduction to patterns with a quiz  on pattern recognition at the end.

  http://www.azafis.gov/skills.asp 

3. Here is another site with even more practice

:www.newscientist.com/gallery/mg20527522600-guess-the-fingerprints

Supplemental reading: to be used to further understand the potential flaws with forensic evidence.

1.The Troubling Flaws in Forensic Science 

 http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20150512-can-we-trust-forensic-science

2. Fingerprints: Not a Gold Standard 

 http://issues.org/20-1/mnookin/

3. 2003 article: FIngerprints: Infallible Evidence?

Lesley Stahl Explores the Problem With Fingerprint Evidence

  http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fingerprints-infallible-evidence/

4. Faulty fingerprints:

  http://www.bu.edu/sjmag/scimag2005/opinion/fingerprints.htm 

5.  Forensic Tools: What's Reliable and What's Not -So-Scientific PBS Frontline article

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/criminal-justice/real-csi/forensic-tools-whats-reliable-and-whats-not-so-scientific/

Day 6- 42 minutes

Fingerprinting Labs *Disclaimer- These are suggested labs , however it is up to teacher discretion whether to include these based on supply availability.

Formative assessment:

Lab skills and lab analysis.

Fingerprinting Lab  (must go to latent finger printing section)   http://sciencespot.net/Pages/classforsci.html#fiingerprint

Fingerprinting Labs- with common household supplies.  You may wish to have your students conduct some fingerprinting labs on their own.  Here is a link to a lab that can be conducted with simple household supplies.

 http://www.hometrainingtools.com/a/forensics-science-newsletter

Middle School Options Some of the material in this lesson maybe too complex for middle school.  This is a great site with complete lessons on many forensic topics, including fingerprinting   http://sciencespot.net/Pages/classforsci.html#fiingerprint

Day 7 & Day 8
End of Unit Activity 

Summative assessment:


After completing the activities in this unit, you will develop an argumentative response to the question: Should fingerprints be the only piece of evidence used to convict a person of a crime?

1. Create an argument that discusses the pros and cons of using fingerprints as evidence for convicting a person of a crime.

2. You must include a wide variety of lessons and examples in your argument, including information in any of the supplemental reading sources.

3. You must, at the end, have a conclusion to the question: Are fingerprints enough forensic evidence for conviction?

4. You may use any type of format to present this argument (essay, powerpoint, video, smore, prezi ,  etc...)


 


 


LONDONDERRY HIGH SCHOOL

Rubric for Fingerprinting Lesson

 

A/5/EXCEEDS

B/4/MEETS

C/3/MEETS

D/2/DOES NOT MEET

F/1/DOES NOT MEET

LITERACY THROUGH READING

Demonstrates a thorough understanding of written material.

Demonstrates understanding of written material.

Demonstrates an adequate understanding of written material.

Demonstrates a minimal understanding of written material.

Does not understand or makes no effort to understand written material.

LITERACY THROUGH WRITING

Demonstrates mastery of written expression.

Effectively uses written expression.

Written expression needs some improvement.

Written work needs improvement.

Written work needs a great deal of improvement.

LITERACY THROUGH THINKING

Understands both oral and written language and concepts appropriate to the course.

Understands most language and concepts.

Generally understands basic language and concepts.

Shows poor comprehension of the language and concepts.

Shows lack of comprehension of the language and concepts.

CRITICAL THINKING and PROBLEM SOLVING

Independently connects new concepts with previously learned concepts.

Connects new concepts with previously learned concepts.

Recognizes that connections exist.

Occasionally makes connections between concepts.

Does not make connections between concepts.

Effectively organizes and synthesizes information

Organizes and synthesizes information.

Organizes and synthesizes information.

Demonstrates no synthesis of information.

Demonstrates no synthesis of information.

CRITICAL THINKING and PROBLEM SOLVING

Thoroughly evaluates evidence; justifies a logical conclusion.

Correctly evaluates most evidence; presents a logical conclusion.

Evaluates evidence; presents a conclusion.

Poorly evaluates or misinterprets evidence; draws inaccurate or inadequate conclusion.

Does not evaluate evidence; draws no conclusion.


 




Return to top