OER Recommender

My Tags For This Item

To save your tags,
please sign in
Not a member yet?
Register now

My Review For This Item

To save your reviews,
please sign in
Not a member yet?
Register now

My Notes For This Item

To save your notes,
please sign in
Not a member yet?
Register now

My Saved Searches

To save your searches,
please sign in.
Not a member yet?
Register now.

Domain Names

 
Rating: Not rated yet
  Rate item
Type: Course Related Materials
Grade Level: Post-secondary
Author: William Fisher, Dori Kornfeld, Dotan Oliar, David Abrams
Subject: Social Sciences
Institution Name: Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Harvard Law School

Abstract: The commercialization of the Internet has dramatically increased the importance and economic value of domain names. The sets of alphanumeric characters denoting Internet addresses have become a major source of cash, controversy, and case law. Catchy dot-com phrases are splashed across billboards, buses, and Superbowl advertisements. Companies and individuals struggle over the more attractive and memorable of the names, resorting to the courts, alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and the private market to settle their disputes. In late 1999, for example, the peak of the dot-com hype, eCompanies reportedly paid $7.5 million for the rights to the "business.com" tag -- the highest price ever to be paid for a domain name. Trademark law has proven to be an awkward device for resolving conflicts over domain names. For example, traditional trademark law allows two non-competing entities to utilize the same mark, as long as there is no likelihood of consumer confusion. However, in cyberspace only one .com domain utilizing the mark can exist. Accordingly, during the past four years, various jurisdictions have been experimenting with new legal systems for addressing such conflicts. The most important such regime is the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), which provides a quick and relatively inexpensive procedure to settle matters through mandatory arbitration, which registrants agree to when they register domain names. The UDRP allows a party to file a complaint with a pre-approved dispute resolution service provider to assert rights to another party's registered domain name if the name corresponds to the complainant's existing trademark or service mark. Another tool now available to U.S. trademark holders is the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows trademark holders to file suit against parties who allegedly "register, traffic in, or use" domain names identical or confusingly similar to their marks. A recent development that, together with the previous two, may alleviate the need to either pay enormous sums for domain names or to litigate or arbitrate their ownership is the process administered by ICANN, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, of adding seven new generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs), such as .biz, .info and .name to the traditional ones, such as .com, .org and .net. This module describes and evaluates both the old and the new regimes -- and considers the various proposals currently on the table for further reform. We begin with two case studies, intended to whet your appetite. We then review the relevant technology and legal doctrines. Summaries of recent domain-names disputes follow. Finally, we propose some topics for the online discussion forum.

Details

Course Type: Learning Module
Material Types: Other
Media Formats: Text/HTML, Downloadable docs
Language: English

Conditions of Use: Custom License

Please be advised that if you choose to reprint the module materials, you are responsible for asking permission of the individual authors in concordance with U.S. copyright law.

Additional Information

Geographic Regional Relevance: All

Tags For This Item

Tags are a way to find OER by keywords added by users
This item wasn't tagged yet.

Keywords

Keywords are descriptions assigned by the provider or the OER Commons Team.