You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
You must be logged in to perform this action.
- Author:
-
Yablo, Stephen
- Subject:
- Humanities, Social Sciences
- Institution Name:
- M.I.T.
- Collection:
-
MIT OpenCourseWare
- Grade Level:
- Post-secondary
- Abstract:
An examination of philosophical issues on the theme of relativism. Are moral standards relative to cultures and/or moral frameworks? Are there incompatible or non-comparable ways of thinking about the world that are somehow equally good? Is science getting closer to the truth? Is rationality -- the notion of a good reason to believe something -- relative to cultural norms? What are selves? Is there a coherent form of relativism about the self? Discussion of these questions through the writings of contemporary philosophers such as Thomas Kuhn, Karl Popper, Gilbert Harman, Judith Thomson, and Derek Parfit. Emphasis on ways of making these vague questions precise, and critical evaluation of philosophical arguments.
- Languages:
- English
- Material Type:
- Assessments, Full Course, Homework and Assignments, Lecture Notes, Syllabi
- Media Format:
- Text/HTML, Downloadable docs
- Conditions of Use:
-
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0
No restrictions on your remixing, redistributing, or making derivative works.
Give credit to the author, as required.
Your remixing, redistributing, or making derivatives works comes with some
restrictions, including how it is shared.
Your redistributing comes with some restrictions. Do not remix or make
derivative works.
Copyrighted materials, available under Fair Use and the TEACH Act for US-based
educators, or other custom arrangements. Go to the resource provider to see
their individual restrictions.
Relativism, Reason, and Reality, Spring 2005
Comments: